 | 1914 - 1320 str.
...the more favorable rules of the common law, unless the basis of the attempted classification rests upon some difference which bears a reasonable and...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and is not made arbitrarily and without such basis. Guff, C. & SFR Co. v. Ellis, 165 U. S. 150, 41... | |
 | 1912 - 1648 str.
...fourteenth amendment because "the attempted classification was arbitrary, and was not made to rest jpon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act, the tfamg, in respect of which the classification is proposed." We fully concur with the circuit court... | |
 | Hermann Nothnagel, Michael Joseph Rossbach - 1914 - 732 str.
...classification must not be arbitrary,* and must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed." So when the question of the power of a state to classify for the purpose of taxation was presented... | |
 | Eugene Wambaugh - 1915 - 1106 str.
...occupation and not on the value or the amount of the business j is arbitrary. " A classification must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...respect to which the classification is proposed." Connolly t>. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 560. CHAPTER III. THE FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT. UNITED STATES... | |
 | James Parker Hall - 1915 - 492 str.
...against the public interest (9). All classification for purposes of regulation "must always be based upon some difference which bears a reasonable and...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without such basis." This was said in declaring invalid a statute... | |
 | William Mark McKinney, Burdett Alberto Rich - 1915 - 1264 str.
...The general rule is that a classification must always rest on some difference which bears a natural, reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and that a classification will be upheld if it is based on such a foundation.11 A law is not general... | |
 | American Medical Association. Bureau of legal medicine and legislation - 1915 - 526 str.
...striking down of such a classification it must be "obviously arbitrary," and must be shown "not to rest on some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act — the thing — in respect to which the classification is proposed." This was not shown. On. the... | |
 | 1916 - 1098 str.
...exact exclusion or inclusion Of persons and things. However, the classification adopted must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. Accordingly a statute levying one rate... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1916 - 808 str.
...associations, in order to subserve public objects. For this court has held that classification 'must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. * * But arbitrary selection can never... | |
 | 1916 - 834 str.
...cannot be an exact exclusion or inclusion of persons and things. The classification adopted must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. A statute levying one rate of tax on... | |
| |
That must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. 
