 | Montana. Supreme Court - 1916 - 752 str.
...court, reasserting the right of the states to classify, insists that classification ' ' must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...respect to which the classification is proposed." [4] It does not follow, however, that the object in respect to which the classification is made must... | |
 | 1917 - 1368 str.
...the court, reasserting the right of the states to classify, insists that classification "must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...respect to which the classification is proposed." It does not follow, however, that the object in respect to which the classification is made must commend... | |
 | Ohio. Courts - 1917 - 642 str.
...must be assumed, in the opinion of the Legislature to protect the public. "Classification must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis." Connolly v. Company, 184 US, 560. "The... | |
 | 1917 - 1304 str.
...its resources and prosperity, etc. Same. Classification must always rest upon some difference bearing a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, though it need not always depend on scientific cr marked differences in things or persons or relations,... | |
 | Montana. Supreme Court - 1917 - 764 str.
...touching the right of the state through its legislature to classify, so long as such classification rests upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the matter in respect to which the classification is proposed (Gulf etc. Ry. Co. v. Ellis, supra; Hill... | |
 | 1909 - 1374 str.
...equally true that such classification cannot be made arbitrarily. [The classification] must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. . . . 'Classification for legislative... | |
 | William Meade Fletcher - 1918 - 1342 str.
...asaoeiations, in order to subserve public objects. For this court has held that classification 'must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable...in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. • * * But arbitrary selection can never... | |
 | 1900 - 802 str.
...classify was conceded, it was said that such classification must be based upon some difference bearing a reasonable and Just relation to the act In respect to which the classification is attempted; that no mere arbitrary selection can ever be Justified by calling it classification. And... | |
 | David Thomas Marvel, John W. Houston, Samuel Maxwell Harrington, James Pennewill, William Henry Boyce, William Watson Harrington, Charles L. Terry, William J. Storey - 1920 - 688 str.
...possible for the court to say there was a fair reason for the exemption, and that the classification rests upon some difference which bears a reasonable and...to the act in respect to which the classification was proposed. This, according to all the authorities, is the test, and measured by such test, we think... | |
 | Mississippi. Supreme Court - 1916 - 1040 str.
...business, con Id not so sue; in other words, to permit a classification based on 'some difference bearing a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect...to which the classification is proposed.' . . . It is not therefore to be supposed 106 Miss.] Opinion of the court. that the last clause of the section... | |
| |
That must always rest upon some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed, and can never be made arbitrarily and without any such basis. 
