 | 1854 - 642 str.
...were so understood by those who heard them. Verdict for the plaintiff. IT. a. Watson now applied for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a verdict entered for the defendant It is clear that the word thief" Is mere abuse; and the other words... | |
 | 1867 - 384 str.
...Exchequer Chamber, upon appeal from a decision of the Queen's Bench discharging a rule for the plaintiff's to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and entered for the defendants, affirmed the judgment of the Queen's Bench (30 Law J. Rep. QB 22). Upon... | |
 | 1873 - 512 str.
...circumstances by any horse. Verdict for the plaintiff. A rule having been obtained calling on the plaintiff to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a nonsuit or verdict for the defendant bo entered on the ground that there was no evidence for the... | |
 | David Thomas Marvel, John W. Houston, Samuel Maxwell Harrington, James Pennewill, William Henry Boyce, William Watson Harrington, Charles L. Terry, William J. Storey - 1909 - 778 str.
...the defendant. Verdict for plaintiff for $200. The Court, upon motion of defendant's counsel, granted a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and defendant let into a new trial. On February 27th, 1907, in arguing said rule, counsel for defendant... | |
 | New South Wales. Supreme Court - 1902 - 894 str.
...jury negativing malice, found a verdict for the defendant. A rule nisi, calling upon the defendant to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted, was granted upon the grounds :-•1. That the verdict was against evidence and... | |
 | 1883 - 1120 str.
...against the weight of the evidence), to move the court in banco for a rule calling upon his opponent to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial had ; and this rule was not granted unless the mover made out a prima facie case.4 Thus... | |
 | Pennsylvania. Courts - 1923 - 958 str.
...moved for a new trial. On the argument, this rule was refused, but a rule was entered on the plaintiff to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and the cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and this rule was made absolute. The court, after examining... | |
 | 1848 - 1086 str.
...was not cognizant of the fraud practised upon the defendant. Mr. MONTAGUE CHAMBERS now moved for n rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a non-suit entered ; or, why there should not be a new trial. He submitted that the Lord Chief Baron... | |
 | 1887 - 958 str.
...defendant. Sylvester C. Smith and Henry 8. Harris, for the State. BEASI/EY, CJ This сазе is before us on a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted. The inquiry thus authorized, however, does not extend so far as to embrace the... | |
 | Henry Flanders - 1999 - 476 str.
...of the wages, up to the time when the ship left Philadelphia. In Michaelmas term, a rule was granted to show cause, why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted, and now Bond showed cause, contending that the plaintiff was entitled to wages... | |
| |
Defendant afterwards, under leave, reserved at the trial, moved for and obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside... 
