 | Great Britain. Court of Probate, Maurice Charles Merttins Swabey, Thomas Hutchinson Tristram - 1860 - 698 str.
...£1,000, and in the costs of the suit. Dr. Phillimore, QC (Mr. Thring with him], moved the Court for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted, on the grounds — first, of misdirection ; secondly, that the verdict was against... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Probate, Maurice Charles Merttins Swabey, Thomas Hutchinson Tristram - 1860 - 702 str.
...£1,000, and in the costs of the suit. Dr. Phillimore, QC (Mr. Thring with him), moved the Court for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted, on the grounds—first, of misdirection; secondly, that the verdict was against... | |
 | Owen Davies Tudor - 1860 - 934 str.
...damages £337. 13s.6d. if the Court should be of opinion that it was. Adair, Serjt., having accordingly obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be entered for the plaintiff, Cockell, Serjt., showed cause. The 21 Jac., being a considerable extension... | |
 | Edmund Macrory - 1860 - 406 str.
...moved, in pursuance of the leave reserved at Motion far the trial, for a rule calling upon the plaintiff to show cause " why ^ «/»• the verdict should not be set aside, and the verdict entered for the defendants instead thereof, or why a nonsuit should not be entered on the... | |
 | William Newton - 1860 - 428 str.
...plaintiffs, but gave the defendants leave to move.* Subsequently, a rule was granted by this Court, to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and entered for the defendants, pursuant to leave reserved at the trial, upon the ground of the invention... | |
 | 1863 - 360 str.
...which it was laid having refused to grant a poll which was demanded. Subsequently the Churchwardens obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and the rule has been argued in the Court of Common Pleas. The judges held that the rate was invalid, that... | |
 | 1862 - 720 str.
...partner of that firm, and that they furnished the starch believing him to be a partner. He moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and the Court unanimously refused it, the Lord President remarking that the evidence that he held himself... | |
 | 1863 - 804 str.
...not be liable. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with 40s. damages. Temple, Q, C., having obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial had on the ground that the judge misdirected the jury, by telling them that the Companies... | |
 | 1852 - 1048 str.
...the Southwark County Court for false imprisonment. Verdict for the defendant. Humfrey now moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted, on the ground of misdirection. Cur. adv. vult. COURT OF EXCHEQUER. April 16. 1851.... | |
 | 1863 - 620 str.
...for defendant, leave to move being reserved. Subsequently a rule was obtained calling upon defendant to show cause why the verdic't should not be set. aside, and a verdict entered for plaintiff, on the grounds, 1st, That the goods never were the defendant's. 2ndly,... | |
| |
Defendant afterwards, under leave, reserved at the trial, moved for and obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside... 
