 | Hannis Taylor - 1889 - 672 str.
...prevent such a contingency the claiming states had procured an amendment of the articles to the effect that no state should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States.1 Delaware and New Jersey soon withdrew from the controversy, leaving the fight for national... | |
 | William Isaac Hull - 1891 - 72 str.
...56 the absence of the Maryland delegates that Congress added the clause to the Ninth Article, which provided that no State should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. The further steps in Maryland's struggle for the nationalization of the western lands have been so... | |
 | Clement Anselm Evans - 1899 - 808 str.
...third article of the Confederation, and the proviso to the ninth (according to which no State is to be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States)," that "we mean not to subject ourselves to such guaranty." * * * "We declare that we will accede to the Confederation,... | |
 | Charles Moore - 1900 - 542 str.
...agreeing with their sister, that Congress even took occasion to provide in the articles of Confederation that no state should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States, although the three smaller states desired to be allowed to share in the proceeds of the sales of Western... | |
 | Benson John Lossing - 1901 - 544 str.
...neighbors. The claimant States secured the insertion of a provision in the Articles of Confederation that no State should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. All the non-claimant States excepting Maryland reluctantly consented to this provision; the latter... | |
 | Hannis Taylor - 1911 - 738 str.
...prevent such a contingency the claiming states had procured an amendment of the Articles to the effect that no state should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States.1 Delaware and New Jersey soon withdrew from the controversy, leaving the fight for national... | |
 | Washington State Bar Association - 1911 - 1472 str.
...to make a cession of their crown lands retaining the juris diction, nor would they consent that any State should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. Out of these conditions, the fears of the smaller States that the larger States would, through their... | |
 | Frederick Charles Hicks - 1920 - 546 str.
...acts of Congress for the security of the parties concerned." The only restriction on the court was that no state should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. For an unquestioned example of a court of arbitration open to the whole world we must turn to the Permanent... | |
 | 1922 - 694 str.
...finally adopted declared The Articles compared with other federations. State "sovereignty" asserted. that no state should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. Interpreting this statement in the light of Virginia's recent reassertion of her sea-to-sea claim,... | |
 | Josephus Nelson Larned - 1923 - 990 str.
...after Maryland's motion, in adding a.clause to the Ninth Article of the Confederation, to the effect that no State should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. . . . What these States desired was either a share in the revenues arising from the western country,... | |
| |
Confederation, to the effect that no State should be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. 
