 | California. Supreme Court - 1918 - 912 str.
...prudence could not have guarded against; 3, Newly discovered evidence material to the defendant's case which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial. The court granted said motion generally and it is its alleged error in so doing of which the appellant... | |
 | Minnesota - 1891 - 666 str.
...contrary to law. "Sixth — Newly discovered evidence, material for the party making the application, which he could not with, reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial. "Seventh — Error in law occurring at the trial and ex cepted to by the party making the application."... | |
 | Montana - 1935 - 648 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1891 - 700 str.
...not be had simply to allow a rehash of old arguments. In his first reason the applicant states that he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the hearing the alleged newly-discovered evidence. The affidavits filed do not j ustify this statement.... | |
 | South Dakota. Supreme Court - 1902 - 760 str.
...new trial may be granted for newly discovered evidence, material to the party making the application, -which he could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the trial, where the affidavit did not state any reason why defendant had not procured the evidence at the trial,... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1894 - 890 str.
...the action is upon a contract or for the injury or detention of property, sixth, that the verdict, report or decision is not sustained by sufficient...reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the time; eif/hth, error of law, occurring at the trial, excepted to by the party making the application."... | |
 | Indiana, Harrison Burns - 1894 - 1050 str.
...Ind. 250; Patton v. Hamilton, 12 Ind. 256; Hudspeth t>. Allen, 26 Ind. 165. Sixth. That the verdict or decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence, or is contrary to law. A verdict in plain and defiant opposition to all the evidence should be set aside. Crossley v. O'Brien,... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1918 - 748 str.
...trial must be made at the term the verdict, report, or decision is rendered, except for the cause of newly discovered evidence material for the party applying, which he could not with reasonable diligence discover and produce at the trial. The application must be made within three Building & L. Co. v. Hosea.... | |
 | Colorado. Court of Appeals - 1895 - 668 str.
...which existed in this case. Newly discovered evidence, material for the party making the application, which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial, is one of the grounds for a new trial enumerated in the code. The application of the party desiring... | |
 | Ohio. Courts - 1901 - 788 str.
...detention of property ; " and in subdivision 6 that " a new trial shall be granted where the verdict, report, or decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence or is contrary to law." In Durell v. Boyd, 9 Ohio St. 72, which was an action for a conversion, the trial court finding on... | |
| |
Newly discovered evidence, material for the party making the application, which he could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced at the trial; 5. 
