 | United States. Congress. Senate - 2000 - 1220 str.
...question, according to the best of his judgment without favour, affection or hope of reward": provided also be appointed, in the manner before prescribed, shall be final 756.12 All controversies concerning the private right of soil claimed under different grants of two... | |
 | David Gordon - 362 str.
...according to the best of his judgment, without favour, affection, or hope of reward:" provided, also, that no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. All controversies concerning the private right of soil, claimed under different grants of two or more... | |
 | Carol Berkin - 2002 - 324 str.
...according to the best of his judgement, without favor, affection or hope of reward': provided also, that no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. All controversies concerning the private right of soil claimed under different grants of two or more... | |
 | Joy Hakim - 2003 - 356 str.
...according to the best of his judgment, without favour, affection or hope of reward:" provided also that no state shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the united states. All controversies concerning the private right of soil claimed under different grants of two or more... | |
 | Neal O. Hammon, Richard Taylor - 2002 - 328 str.
...amendments that Western land would be controlled by all the colonies and instead offered her own amendment that no state shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. Strengthened by this amendment, the Atticles of Confederation were finally adopted by Congress on November... | |
 | Barbara Silberdick Feinberg - 2002 - 120 str.
...according to the best of his judgement, without favor, affection or hope of reward': provided also, that no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. All controversies concerning the private right of soil claimed under different grants of two or more... | |
 | Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay - 2003 - 692 str.
...question according to the best of his judgment, without favor, affection or hope of reward:" provided also that no state shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the united states. All controversies concerning the private right of soil claimed under different grants of two or more... | |
 | John Keane - 2003 - 670 str.
...boundary disputes between states and among conflicting private land claims, the document specified that "no state shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States."38 Maryland refused to accept the clause, partly because its delegates feared the future power... | |
 | J. Kent McGaughy - 2004 - 274 str.
...final nail in the coffin of the dispute over western lands by sponsoring a measure that stipulated how "no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States."41 The October 15 debates over the status of western lands under the Articles of Confederation... | |
 | Clement A. Evans - 2004 - 784 str.
...authority or lawful agent" of one of the States "in controversy"; the adoption of the guarding clause, "No State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States"; the language of the ordinances of 1784 and 1787; subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United... | |
| |
... well and truly to hear and determine the matter in question, according to the best of his judgment, without favour affection or hope of reward:" provided also that no state shall be deprived of territory for the- benefit of the united states. 
