 | 1947 - 718 str.
...acquisition alone, divest such State of its continued criminal jurisdiction over such area acquired. "In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided...respect to the objects committed to it, and neither is sovereign with respect to the objects committed to each other." McCuFloch v. Maryland (4 Wheat,... | |
 | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace - 1918 - 306 str.
...Chief Justice Marshall could say, as he did in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland (4 Wheaton, 316): In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided...committed to it, and neither sovereign with respect ta the objects committed to the other. The first incident is thus recounted by Madison: Previous to... | |
 | Wayne D. Moore - 1998 - 312 str.
...presumed that state governments had authority to act within other spheres. He explained: "In America, powers of sovereignty are divided between the government...sovereign, with respect to the objects committed to the other."20 This passage evokes images of normative boundaries between powers held by the respective... | |
 | Kermit L. Hall - 2000 - 464 str.
...national government in terms of their purpose, deducing their constitutionality from the postulate that "in America, the powers of sovereignty are divided...sovereign with respect to the objects committed to the other."11 Although Marshall and his colleagues stressed the national sovereignty aspect of these principles... | |
 | Kermit L. Hall - 2001 - 806 str.
...constitutionality from the postulate that "in America, the powers of sovereignty are divided hetween the government of the Union, and those of the states. They are each sovereign with respect to the ohjects committed to it, and neither sovereign with respect to the ohjects committed to the other."11... | |
 | Clement A. Evans - 2004 - 512 str.
...nor politically in sympathy with Mr. Jefferson, in rendering a judicial decision in an important case said: " In America the powers of sovereignty are divided...sovereign with respect to the objects committed to the other. If it be true that the Constitution and laws of the land made in pursuance thereof are the... | |
 | Jared Sparks, Edward Everett, James Russell Lowell, Henry Cabot Lodge - 1884 - 632 str.
...-conferred on them, and the latter only the powers reserved to them. Chief -Justice Marshall says : • ' In America the powers of sovereignty are divided between...respect to the objects committed to it, and neither is sovereign with respect to the objects committed to the other." (4 Wheaton, 410.) On this authority... | |
 | 471 str.
...sovereignty are equivalent. As Professor Richard N. Current noted: "In America," to quote [John] Marshall, "the powers of sovereignty are divided between the...sovereign, with respect to the objects committed to them." Like most of his American contemporaries, Marshall did not distinguish clearly between sovereignty... | |
 | 1819 - 652 str.
...But to what portion of sovereignty do« s it appertain' Does it belong to one more than to another? In America, the powers of sovereignty are divided...between the government of the union and those of the state». They are each sovereign, with respect to the objects committed to it, and neither sovereign... | |
 | Ohio State Bar Association - 1907 - 252 str.
...creation of a corporation appertains to sovereignty it pertains to the sovereignty of the Union as well as those of the states. They are each sovereign with respect to the objects committed to them, and neither with respect to the objects committed to the other. The corporation being found to... | |
| |
In America the powers of sovereignty are divided between the government of the Union and those of the states. They are each sovereign with respect to the objects committed to it, and neither sovereign with respect to the other, 
