...are not present here. In Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. 130, 139, indispensable parties were defined as "Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience." 3 The tortfeasor in a Louisiana direct action against the insurer is not such a person. The state has...

...without affecting other persons not before the court, the latter are not indispensable parties. 3. Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience. *A bill to rescind a contract affords [*140 an example of this kind. For, if only a part of those interested...

...If the facts alleged Bhow that plaintiff was entitled to any substantial relief. Necessary Parties. Persons who not only have an Interest In the controversy, but an Interest of such a nature that the final decree cannot be made without either affecting that Interest or leaving the controversy In...

...are not indispensable parties. 3. Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy, but ;m interest of such a nature that a final decree cannot...wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience." In Sioux City Terminal Railroad & Warehouse Co v. Trust Co., 82 F. 124, Circuit Judge Sanborn, speaking...

...(section 55), says: "Indispensable parties are those who not only have an interest in the subjectmatter of the controversy, but an interest of ' such a nature...final decree cannot be made without either affecting their interests or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final determination may be...

...decree could not be made without "affecting that interest or leaving the controversy in such a doubt that its final termination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience." 180 F. Supp. at 65. The court found that R&H's claims were distinct and separate from any claims NAAC...