 | 1922 - 1120 str.
...disputed that there was ample evidence to justify such a finding." It cannot be said that the accident had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have happened as a consequence thereof. The mining company could not, under the law, have employed the deceased... | |
 | William Otis Badger - 1922 - 890 str.
...employment to some peculiar danger, it did not follow as a natural incident of his work, and it does not appear "to have had its origin in a risk connected with the cmplpoyment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence." McNicol's Case. 215, Mass.... | |
 | 1926 - 1286 str.
...which the workman would be equally exposed apart from the employment. 15 The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood....independent of the relation of master and servant. 16 It need not have been foreseen or expected, but Casualty Co. v. Industrial Ace. dustrial Ace. Com.,... | |
 | Minnesota. Supreme Court - 1924 - 428 str.
...employe would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The moving cause of danger must be peculiar to the work, and not common to the neighborhood....must be incidental to the character of the business of the employer, and not independent of the relation of employment. It need not have been, foreseen... | |
 | Minnesota. Supreme Court - 1927 - 362 str.
...as a rational consequence." We believe it must be conceded in the Standke case that the injury was incidental "to the character of the business and not...independent of the relation of master and servant," and also to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that... | |
 | 1917 - 1126 str.
...the workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the | neighborhood....independent of the relation of master and servant." Milliken's Case, 216 Mass, 293, 103 NE 898, LRA 1916A, 337. [2, 3] The Industrial Accident Board have... | |
 | 1917 - 1128 str.
...McNlcols' Case, 215 Mass. 497, nt page 490, 102 N. Б. 697, LRA 191GA, 306: "The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood....the business and not independent of the relation of mastor and servant." The undisputed evidence shows that while the employee was walking along the street... | |
 | 1927 - 1052 str.
...employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work, and not common to the neighborhood. Tt must be incidental to the character of the business,...independent of the relation of master and servant. If the accident, under the circumstances of the employment, was merely a consequence of the severity... | |
 | 1924 - 1010 str.
...the workmen4 would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood....independent of the relation of master and servant." McNicol's Case, 215 Mass. 497, 102 NE 697, L. RA 1916A, 306. The statute cannot be legitimately construed... | |
 | 1921 - 1000 str.
...Co., 90 Conn. 309, 97 Atl. 320, LRA 1916E, 584. As Chief Justice Rugg has said, the causative danger must appear to have had Its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have flowed from that as a rational consequence. McNicol's Case, 215 Mass. 497, 102 NE 697, LRA 1916A, 300. We are unable... | |
| |
It need not have been foreseen or or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence. 
