Vyhledávání Obrázky Mapy Play YouTube Zprávy Gmail Disk Další »
Přihlásit se
Knihy Knihy
" The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. "
The Twentieth Century: A People's History - Strana 85
autor/autoři: Howard Zinn - 2009 - 512 str.
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

Freedom: An Introduction with Readings

Nigel Warburton - 2001 - 252 str.
...matter, where Mr Justice Hohues in a Supreme Court decision of 1g1g produced the famous formula ...The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevant. It is a question of proximity and degree ... 6 At least one United States Judge did...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

Conscience, Expression, and Privacy

Kermit L. Hall - 2000 - 424 str.
...decision, Holmes promulgated the clear and present danger test for speech. His often quoted criterion was "whether the words used are used in such circumstances...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." It was a matter of "proximity and degree," Holmes continued, for the First Amendment...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

The Justices, Judging, and Judicial Reputation

Kermit Hall - 2000 - 384 str.
...World War I. Under this test, even speech advocating unlawful action was not to be restricted unless "the words used are used in such circumstances and...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent."t5t Speech may be restricted only if there is a real threat — a danger, both clear...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind

Steven L. Winter - 2003 - 426 str.
...(1993) (noting, too, the influence of Frankfurter, Laski, and Hand). 33. Schenck, 249 US at 52 ("The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent."). 34. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Natural Law, 32 HARV. L. REV. 40, 40 (1918). 35....
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions

Kermit L. Hall - 2001 - 428 str.
...considered the context of the speech as well as the intent of the persons who sent the leaflets. 'The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent" (p. 52). Holmes distinguished wartime and peacetime contexts and concluded that Schenck's...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

Historic U.S. Court Cases: An Encyclopedia, Svazek 2

John W. Johnson - 2001 - 1089 str.
...v. United States (1919), Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, writing a unanimous opinion, declared: "The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." Liberals and progressives cheered the clearand-present-danger test, for it seemed...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

Free Speech and Its Relation to Self-Government

Alexander Meiklejohn - 1948 - 107 str.
...protect a man from an injunction against uttering words which may have all the effect of force. . . . The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

Education and Democracy: The Meaning of Alexander Meiklejohn, 1872–1964

Adam R. Nelson - 2009 - 440 str.
...draftees during war, as Schenck purportedly had done. "The question in every case," Holmes claimed, "is whether the words used are used in such circumstances...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

Eternally Vigilant: Free Speech in the Modern Era

Lee C. Bollinger, Geoffrey R. Stone - 2003 - 330 str.
...entertained. But the most significant contribution of the Schenck opinion was Holmes's statement that "[t]he question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." The so-called clear and present danger testhere used by Holmes to uphold the suppression...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize

Passionate Declarations: Essays on War and Justice

Howard Zinn - 2003 - 368 str.
...was that of an intellectual and a liberal. Holmes said the First Amendment did not protect Schenck: The most stringent protection of free speech would...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.14 It was a clever analogy. Who would think that the right of free speech extended...
Omezený náhled - Podrobnosti o knize




  1. Moje knihovna
  2. Nápověda
  3. Rozšířené vyhledávání knih