 But it is generally held, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful...  American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 3281927Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | 1901 - 1044 str.
...brakes properly applied, the wind could not have done It. "In order to warrant a finding that negligence Is the proximate cause of an injury, It must appear...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that It was such аз might or ought to have been foreseen. In the light of the attending... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1887 - 792 str.
...of legal knowledge, but of fact for the jury to determine in view of the accompanying circumstances. A finding that negligence, or an act not amounting...wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, is not warranted unless it appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1887 - 1104 str.
...of legal knowledge, but of fact for the jury to determine in view of the accompanying circumstances. A finding that negligence, or an act not amounting...wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, is not warranted unless it appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negHAdams... | |
 | 1911 - 1320 str.
...be literally accurate for the purpose of illustratingthe rule that is well established in this state that, in order to warrant ,a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to a wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury» it must appear that the injury was the natural... | |
 | 1902 - 1284 str.
..."In order to warrant a finding that negligence * * * is the proximate cause of an injury, It should appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act. and that It ought to have been foreseen,— not necessarily the precise, actual injury, but some... | |
 | 1913 - 1322 str.
...a fundamental rule of law that to recover damages on account of unintentional negligence of another It must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. St L.,... | |
 | 1918 - 1336 str.
...rule is, perhaps, best stated in the last-cited case, in the following language: "It is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1928 - 1120 str.
...in Milwaukee, etc. Railway Co. v. Kettogg, 94 US 469, at page 475 said : But it is generally held, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence,...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances.... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1913 - 694 str.
...successive instruments. Pulaski Gas Light Co. v. McClintock, 97 Ark. 584. It is generally held, however, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence,...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances.... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1916 - 700 str.
...regard to the wires was the proximate cause of the injury. In order to warrant a finding that negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances, but... | |
| |
