| Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1829 - 670 str.
...suit, was not the same now sued on, was inadmissible: to which instructions the plaintiff excepted; the jury found for the defendant; the plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was overruled; the plaintiff stated the whole evidence, and excepted to that opinion also. The... | |
| Rhode Island. Supreme Court - 1915 - 654 str.
...before Mr. Justice Doran and a jury and on the eighth day of January, 1914, a verdict was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and his motion was denied by the... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1860 - 718 str.
...rent for said premises, during such disturbance. The court refused the third, and gave all the others. The jury found for the defendant ; the plaintiff moved for a new trial ; the court overruled the motion, and plaintiff excepted. The errors assigned, are : 1st. The court... | |
| 1920 - 948 str.
...was intoxicated when the accident occurred, and that this cither caused or contributed to his fall. The jury found for the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict ; that it was against law ; and of... | |
| 1920 - 968 str.
...was intoxicated when the accident occurred, and that this either caused or contributed to his fall. The jury found for the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict; that it was against law; and of errors... | |
| Mississippi. Supreme Court - 1846 - 890 str.
...notes, knew of the deeds from Conger to the Briscoes, and had seen the covenants therein contained. The jury found for the defendant; the plaintiff moved for a new trial on two grounds. 1. That the court received improper evidence. 2. That the verdict was contrary to law.... | |
| Mississippi. Supreme Court - 1859 - 810 str.
...plaintiffs in error were convicted and sentenced for the murder of Ely, a slave. A motion was made for a new trial on the following grounds, to wit: 1. Because the verdict was contrary to law and evidence. 2. Because witnesses who should have been excluded were allowed... | |
| |