 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1881 - 896 str.
...accruing. By the new statute it is declared that " no acknowledgment or promise shall be received as evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but... | |
 | Idaho (Ter.) - 1881 - 588 str.
...contract, by which jfmmi" St to take the case out of tlie operation of this Chapter, ° eiuwrU '"° unless the same is contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby. SEC. 179. When a cause of action has arisen in Limitation another State or Territory,... | |
 | 1889 - 960 str.
...defines the acts which shall or may arrest the operation of the statute, and is аз follows: "J4o acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence...contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby." It is not claimed that any such written promise as is here required was made in this... | |
 | 1910 - 1168 str.
...is fixed at six years by the succeeding section. Section 24 of the saine title is as follows: "ICo acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence...whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same is contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but... | |
 | 1897 - 1148 str.
...elucidate the general principles by which such questions are governed. Section 24, which provides that no acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract to take a case out of the operation of the statute, unless the same is in writing signed by the party... | |
 | 1885 - 1000 str.
...of a new or continuing contract," to take a case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, "unless the same is contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby." But, I presume, the rule in pleading a contract within the statute of frauds, applies in this case. It is... | |
 | 1920 - 960 str.
...the statute of limitations, which provides that— "No acknowledgment or promise shall be evidenced of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of the provisions of this act, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the... | |
 | Minnesota. Supreme Court - 1887 - 618 str.
...evidence of a new or continuing contract by which to take the case out of the operation of this chapter, unless the same is contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section shall not alter the effect of any payment of principal or interest." Section 23 (Pub. St. 1858)... | |
 | Montana. Supreme Court, Henry Nichols Blake - 1888 - 696 str.
...Procedure defines the acts which shall or may arrest the operation of the statute, and is as follows: "No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient...contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby." It is not claimed that any such written promise as is here required was made in this... | |
 | 1888 - 884 str.
...в« PROVED, it seems, under section 31 of the California statute of limitations, which provides that "no acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient...whereby to take the case out of the operation of this statute, unless the same shall be contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby.... | |
| |
No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section... 
