 | Austin Wakeman Scott - 1919 - 770 str.
...from the order granting a new trial is that it does not expressly appear therefrom that it was granted on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence and, as the record presents no errors in law to justify a new trial, the order should be reversed and... | |
 | Jarvis Dinsmoor - 1921 - 852 str.
...Case: Verdict, $150 for plaintiff. Exception to the ruling of the court on the motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. Court: "When a question is fairly and intelligently submitted to a jury, their determination ought... | |
 | Arthur B. Honnold - 1922 - 1046 str.
...in a case points only to the conclusion of fact found by the verdict, a motion for new trial, based on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence, should be overruled. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World, v. Thiebaud, 69 P. 348, 65 Kan. 332 ; Minneapolis... | |
 | 1906 - 530 str.
...Rep. 982. 14. APPEAL AND KRKOK— New Trial.— A grant of a new trial will not be sustained as based on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence and wasdiscretionary, unless the record shows It waa so granted.-/!^ Bradley 's Estate, Minn., 106... | |
 | 1895 - 1058 str.
...appellate court will not Interfere with a refusal of the trial court to grant a new tri:il, solely on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. Appeal from general sessions circuit court of Abbeville county; It. C. Watts, Judge. Allen Chiles was... | |
 | 1927 - 1044 str.
...court to grant a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence, and the second new trial granted on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence, the motion for a third new trial, on the ground of passion and prejudice and that the verdict was not... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 892 str.
...the defendants' motion for a new trial, and the Supreme Court says: " It seems that it was granted on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. The granting of new trials, for such reasons, rests on the sound discretion of the Court, and we see... | |
 | Minnesota. Supreme Court - 1913 - 678 str.
...specifically stated by the trial court, in the order or in its memorandum, that the new trial was granted on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. We do not sustain this contention. While the memorandum does not so specifically state, it is perfectly... | |
 | Kansas. Supreme Court, Elliot V. Banks, William Craw Webb, Asa Maxson Fitz Randolph, Gasper Christopher Clemens, Thomas Emmet Dewey, Llewellyn James Graham, Oscar Leopold Moore, Earl Hilton Hatcher, Howard Franklin McCue - 1907 - 964 str.
...not guilty upon the charge of maintaining a nuisance. The appellant filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence, which motion was denied, and he was sentenced and now appeals to this court. The county attorney admits... | |
| |
... on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. 
