 | John Hall Hindmarsh - 1845 - 464 str.
...accent more mournful than is common to their profession, answered, " Then you knew not Mademoiselle, Sir ! — you never beheld a lovelier" — " La Roche !" exclaimed he, in reply. — " Alas ! it was she indeed !"— The appearance of surprise and grief which his countenance assumed, attracted the... | |
 | George Vandenhoff - 1846 - 398 str.
...more mournful than is common to their profession, answered, " " Then you knew not Mademoiselle, sir 1 You never beheld a lovelier." " La Roche !" exclaimed he, in reply. " Alas ! it was she, indeed !" Hume : " I perceive, sir, you were acquainted with Mademoiselle La Roche." " Acquainted... | |
 | George Vandenhoff - 1847 - 396 str.
...accent more mournful than is common to their profession, answered. " Then you knew not Mademoiselle, sir ? You never beheld a lovelier." " La Roche !" exclaimed he, in reply. " Alas ! it was she, indeed !" The appearance of surprise and grief which his countenance assumed attracted the notice... | |
 | Henry Mackenzie - 1847 - 534 str.
...mournful than is common to their profession, answered, " Then you knew not Mademoiselle, Sir 1 — you never beheld a lovelier" — " La Roche !" exclaimed he, in reply — "Alas it was she indeed !" — The appearance of surprise and grief which his countenance assumed, attracted the... | |
 | David Bates Tower, Cornelius Walker - 1850 - 292 str.
...accent more mournful than is common to their profession, answered, "Then you knew not mademoiselle, sir ? You never beheld a lovelier." " La Roche ! " exclaimed he, in reply. " Alas ! it was she indeed !" The appearance of surprise and grief which his countenance assumed, attracted the notice... | |
 | Robert Chambers - 1851 - 764 str.
...mournful than is common to their profession, answered, ' then you knew not Mademoiselle, sir ! you »ever or the echoing horn, No more shall rouse she indeed!' The appear uce of surprise and grief which his countenance asnmed attracted the notice... | |
 | Henry Mackenzie - 1852 - 38 str.
...accent more mournful than is common to their profession, answered, "Then you knew not Mademoiselle, Sir! — you never beheld a lovelier." "La Roche?" exclaimed he in reply. Alas! it was she, indeed ! The appearance of surprise and grief which his countenance assumed, attracted the notice... | |
 | Robert Demaus - 1859 - 612 str.
...accent more mournful than is common to their profession, answered, " Then you knew not Mademoiselle, sir ! — you never beheld a lovelier." "La Roche!" exclaimed he, in reply. "Alas! it was she indeed ! " The appearance of surprise and grief which his countenance assumed attracted the notice... | |
 | Robert Demaus - 1860 - 580 str.
...accent more mournful than is common to their profession, answered, " Then you knew not Mademoiselle, sir ! — you never beheld a lovelier." "La Roche!" exclaimed he, in reply. "Alas! it was she indeed!" The appearance of surprise and grief which his countenance assumed attracted the notice... | |
 | Rossiter Johnson - 1874 - 212 str.
...than is common to their profession, answered, — " Then you knew not Mademoiselle, sir ? You nevei beheld a lovelier — " " La Roche ! " exclaimed he in reply. " Alas ! it was she indeed." The appearance of surprise and grief which his countenance assumed attracted the notice... | |
| |
s making inquiry who was the person they had been burying, one of them, with an accent more mournful than is common to their profession, answered, "Then you knew not Mademoiselle, sir! — you never beheld a lovelier. 
