Sansom v. Mercer..... .Burglary.. ..Bailments.. .Mandamus. .115 Pa. St. 530.... 580 68 Tex. 488...... 505 Schleissman v. Kallenberg....... Neg. instruments... 72 Iowa, 338........... 247 Schwallback v. Chicago etc. R'y Co. Adverse possession. 69 Wis. 292.......... Sisk v. Crump.. Smith v. Kerr...... ..... South Side Passenger Railway State v. Calhoun.. 740 ..Husband and wife.117 Pa. St. 248.... 662 .Mar'ge and divorce. 97 N. C. 252........... 290 .Homesteads....... 97 N. C. 344..... 297 .Highways... ....112 Ind. 504...... 213 ..Landlord and ten't. 108 N. Y. 31...... 362 .Estates of decedents. 117 Pa. St. 382.... 668 69 Wis. 224...... 738 98 N. C. 393..... 338 } 76 Ga. 322....... 44 ..Contracts.... ....117 Pa. St. 67..... 645 .Murder... 98 N. C. 599..... 351 Jurisdiction-wills. 15 R. I. 553...... 925 .Highways.... .112 Ind. 133. Trammell and Company v. Mount. Mechanics' liens.... 68 Tex. 210...... 479 Ulrich v. New York Central & Common carriers..108 N. Y. 80...... 369 H. R. R. R. Co. } 82 Vogel v. Brown Township........Judgments........112 Ind. 299...... 187 ........ .Laches-executions. 68 Tex. 418.. 193 501 West Mahanoy Towns'p v. Watson. Negligence... Whaley v. Jarrett... Ways..... Bailments 15 R. I. 563..... .121 Ill. 91.... 929 68 .116 Pa. St. 344.... 604 69 Wis. 613...... 764 Wheeler and Wilson Manufac husband and wife. 115 Pa. St. 487.... 575 turing Company v. Heil. CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA. TURNIPSEED v. SCHAEFER. [76 GEORGIA, 109.] ACTS RELATIVE TO VOLUNTARY ASSIGNMENTS by insolvent debtors are remedial statutes, and, as against the assignor and those holding under him, should be construed liberally in favor of creditors. Assignment For Creditors. —Incomplete schedule and no schedule differ in degree only. ID. - OMISSION FROM SCHEDULE of property of little or no value, or of creditors whose claims aggregate but a small amount, may not invalidate assignment; but if such omissions are of large sums from assets and from amount due creditors, the case is otherwise. TO INVALIDATE ASSIGNMENT for benefit of creditors on account of omissions of creditors from schedule, it is not necessary that there should be a guilty intention to make such omissions. SCHEDULE MUSt be Full and Complete to be valid, as no means are provided for perfecting incomplete schedules, and our courts are not authorized to amend such schedules. GENERAL PROVISION IN ASSIGNMENT FOR BENEFIT OF CREDITORS, that the assignee be directed to take possession of any property of assignor that may have been omitted from assets as named in schedule, is against the policy of the law, especially where details are required to be set forth with particularity. PREFERENCES IN AJSIGNMENTS FOR BENEFIT OF CREDITORS, although permitted, aro not favored. Act of 1885 corroborates sections 1945 and 1946 of the code, and article 1, section 2, paragraph 6, of the constitution of 1877 (code, section 5023), by encouraging all creditors of assignor to use any proper means to detect and defeat any fraudulent concealment or disposition of property of assignor. ACTION by W. W. Turnipseed and other creditors against George Schaefer and his assignees to set aside an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and for the appointment of a |