 Negligence is the absence of care according to the circumstances, and is always a question for the jury when there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them. When the measure of duty is ordinary and reasonable...  American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 5661927Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | 1879 - 556 str.
...NEGLIGENCE — RAILROAD COMPANIES— DUTIES WITH REGARD TO CARRYING AND LANDING PASSENGERS.— 1. When there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts or as to the inferences to be drawn from them, or when the measure of duty is ordinary and reasonable care, and the degree of care varies according... | |
 | 1887 - 652 str.
...are doubtful. In other words, the question of negligence is for the jury when there is substantial doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them." If. however, the evidence is such that, admitting all of it favorable to the plaintiff to be true,... | |
 | United States - 1928 - 1058 str.
...the question of assumption of a risk by the employee is one of law for the court, but where there is doubt as to the facts or as to the inferences to be drawn from them, it becomes a question for the jury." Falyk V. Pennsylvania R. Co. (1917) 100 A. 901, 256 Pa. 397; Mumma... | |
 | 1916 - 1232 str.
...care according to the circumstances of each case, and is always a question for the jury, when there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inference to be drawn from them ; ie, where reasonable men may differ as to the existence thereof."... | |
 | 1887 - 1042 str.
...the absence of care according to the circumstances, and is always ;\ question for the jury when there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them. When the measure of duty is ordinary and reasonable care, and the degree of care varies according to... | |
 | 1888 - 1000 str.
...Harrisburg v. S'iylor, 87 Pa. St. 216. "Negligence is always a question for the jury when there is reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from tlrem. Where the measure of duty is ordinary and reasonable care, and the degree of care varies according... | |
 | 1895 - 1180 str.
...that would consume time to very little, If any, purpose. Whenever there is a conflict of testimony, or, for any cause, there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, oc as to the inferences to be drawn from them, negligence is always a question for the Jury. This case... | |
 | 1916 - 1342 str.
...Frisco L. Co. т. Thomas, 42 OkL 070, 142 Рас. 310. "It is always a question for the jury when there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them; ie, where reasnnable mon ttiny differ as to the existence thereof." Rock Island Co. v. Davis. 44 Okl.... | |
 | 1887 - 972 str.
...the absence of care according to the circumstances, and is always a question for the jury when there is a reasonable doubt as to the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from them. When the me;isure of duty is ordinary and reasonable care, and the degree of care varies according... | |
 | Randolph Stauffer, Wellington M. Bertolet - 1917 - 260 str.
...hour, the question of negligence is properly left to the jury. If there is a conflict of evidence, or, for any cause, there is a reasonable doubt as...the facts, or as to the inferences to be drawn from the facts established by the evidence, the contributory negligence of a pedestrian who was injured... | |
| |
