 | 1905 - 1278 str.
...The restraint provided Is only such as Is necessary to afford fair protection to respondent, and is not so large as to Interfere with the Interests of the public — the proper test to be applied in such cases. Kronschnabel-Smith Co. v. Kronschnabel, 87 Minn. 230,... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1906 - 796 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party requires can be of no benefit... | |
 | 1904 - 766 str.
...as only to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public, then the covenant is not unreasonable." So as to negligence, it may seem obvious enough that, as a... | |
 | Ohio. Circuit Court - 1907 - 678 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public." It does not seem that this restriction was greater than th; interest of the plaintiff required. It... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1908 - 758 str.
...only as to afford n fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the parly requires can be of no benefit... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1908 - 288 str.
...one as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either;... | |
 | 1909 - 452 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection as to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatsoever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either... | |
 | Colorado. Supreme Court - 1909 - 676 str.
...necessary to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in whose favor it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Agreements like this must be construed with reference to the objects sought to be attained by them.... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1909 - 1086 str.
...only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public ; ' " and the court added : " Indeed, what public policy requires is often a vague and difficult inquiry.... | |
 | 1909 - 920 str.
...only affording "a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it was given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. " The restraint was no larger than the needs of the covenantee required. It was of material benefit... | |
| |
And we do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so... 
