...without whose presence before the court a final decree could not be made, without either affecting its interest, or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final determination might be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience. Minnesota v. Northern Securities...

...latter without affecting the interests of the former; and parties with an interest in the controversy of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made...the controversy in such a condition that its final determination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience.7 Of these the first two classes...

...person who has an interest in the controversy of such a nature that a final decree cannot be rendered •without either affecting that interest or leaving...the controversy in such a condition that its final determination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience. Minnesota v. Northern Securities...

...111. 353, 354. Parties. The expression includes all persons who have an interest in the controversy of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made without either affecting their interests or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final termination may be wholly...

...parties so indispensable that a court of equity will not proceed to final decision without them, viz: "Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...inconsistent with equity and good conscience." The case we are considering is essentially one on the part of the petitioner to protect from interference...

...parties so indispensable that fc, court of equity will not proceed to final decision without them, viz: "Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...affecting that interest, or leaving the controversy hi such, a condition that its final termination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience."...

...person or corporation is an indispensable party, all persons who have an interest in the controversy of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made without affecting that interest, or without leaving the controversy in such condition that its final determination...

...person or corporation is an indispensable part}', all persons who have an interest in the controversy of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made without affecting that interest, or without leaving the controversy in euch condition that its final determination...

...parties so indispensable that a court of equity will not proceed to final decision without them, viz: "Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...inconsistent with equity and good conscience." The case we are considering is essentially one on the part of the petitioner to protect from interference...

...are not present here. In Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. 130, 139, indispensable parties were defined as "Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy,...wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience." 3 The tortfeasor in a Louisiana direct action against the insurer is not such a person. The state has...