 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1852 - 716 str.
...at the 74th session; and by ^110, which is alike in both the amendatory acts, it is declared, that " No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence...whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but... | |
 | New York (State) - 1852 - 606 str.
...was created. § 110. [90.] (Amended 1849.) Acknowledgment or new promise must be made in writing. — No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence...whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the ;y to be charged thereby ; but this... | |
 | Henry Whittaker - 1852 - 900 str.
...acknowledgment of the parties. ( The. provision of the Code in this respect (sec. 110) is as follows : § 110. No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence...continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of thia title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1853 - 732 str.
...the case, grounded on any simple contract, no acknowledgment or promise by words only shall be deemed sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of the said enactments, (statute of limitations, 21 Jac. I. c. 16,) or either of them, or... | |
 | New York (State) - 1855 - 802 str.
...liability was created. § 110. [90.) (Amended 1849.) Acknowledgment or new promise must be made in writing. No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence...whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but... | |
 | 1855 - 532 str.
...the case grounded on any simple contract, no acknowledgment or promise by words only shall be deemed sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the Statute of Limitations, " unless such acknowledgment or promise shall be made or contained by or in... | |
 | 1856 - 598 str.
...legislature. A subsequent section of this same title accordingly provides in the broadest language " That no acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take this case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1856 - 724 str.
...and not upon what was transacted antecedently. By the code (§ 110) no acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the operation of the title prescribing the limitations, unless the VOL. XXI. 57 Winchell v. Bowman. same... | |
 | William H. R. Wood - 1857 - 834 str.
...penalty or forfeiture attached, or the liability was created. Авт. 31, Sec. 31. No acknowledgement or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or...whereby to take the case out of the operation of this statute, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to Ъе charged thereby.... | |
 | Francis Edward Cornwell - 1859 - 702 str.
...it, made after that time. Esselstyn v. Weeks, 2 Kern., 635. Section 110 of the Code, is as follows: "No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient...whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but... | |
| |
No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section... 
