In that case the condition of the policy was that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, or if the building insured should be upon ground not owned by the insured in fee simple. American Law Reports Annotated - Strana 6321927Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | 1927 - 1672 str.
...insured a frame building used in a manufacturing busi[47 ALR ness, and the stock and machinery therein, and provided that the entire policy should be void...insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, the court held that a breach of the foregoing provision avoided the policy as to the entire property,... | |
 | 1923 - 454 str.
...under a contract which is void or unenforceable. So, where an automobile theft policy provided that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than "unconditional and sole ownership," and the automobile was a stolen one which the insured had purchased, the policy was void, since by... | |
 | 1902 - 546 str.
...fire, and they and the corn in them were destroyed. The policy contained the following provisions: (1) That the entire policy should be void if the interest of the insured in the property be not truly stated therein: (2) that the entire policy should be void if the hazard... | |
 | John Allen Finch - 1916 - 644 str.
...distributed among several classes of property. Same — Sole Ownership — Forfeiture: The provision that the entire policy should be void if the interest of the insured was other than sole and unconditional ownership or if the property was encumbered by chattel mortgage is reasonable... | |
 | 1897 - 1548 str.
...interest may appear." His interest exceeded the amount of the insurance. The policies provided that they should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional ownership, or if the building was on ground not owned by the insured in fee. Held, That, in the absence... | |
 | John Allen Finch - 1919 - 572 str.
...face, the policy was rendered Inoperative and void under the provision that there could be no recovery if the "interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership." [Judgment for plaintiff below. Here reversed in favor of company.] Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co.... | |
 | 1894 - 1170 str.
...that its language is susceptible of no other reasonable construction. It was plainly provided therein that the entire policy should be void if the interest of the assured in the property was' other than solo and unconditional ownership. It was the solo and unconditional... | |
 | 1902
...be vold'lf the hazard be increased by any means within the control or knowledge of the Insured; (3) that the entire policy should be void If the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership; and (4) that "this p"licy Is made and accepted subject... | |
 | 1897 - 1212 str.
...further provided that, unless otherwise provided by an agreement Indorsed thereon or added thereto, the policy should be void If the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, or If the subject of the insurance was a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple,... | |
 | 1908 - 1190 str.
...itself of its defense to an action on the policy. In that case the condition of the policy was that it should be void if the interest of the insured was other than unconditional and sole ownership, or if the building insured should be upon ground not owned by the insured in fee simple. In this case... | |
| |