 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1900 - 1204 str.
...departure from the strict rule of law, which requires that the plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary. Taylor's Landlord and Tenant, p. 71 ; Ahlerson v. Miller, 15 Gratt. 279. Subject to these... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Hiram Edward Sickels - 1901 - 738 str.
...adverse title .aid are, or appear from the record to be, intruders, or trespassers, upon the title. The rule, that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover...object that the plaintiff has not proved a perfect NY Rep.] Opinion of the Court, ptr ORAY, J. title against those who might claim adversely. The plaintiff... | |
 | 1901 - 1006 str.
...but, If he repudiates it the burden should remain upon the plaintiff. It le a well-settled principle that a plaintiff In ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of the title of the party in possession. (128 NC 508) BRINKLEY т. BRINKLEY et... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1901 - 814 str.
...but if he repudiates it, the burden should remain upon the plaintiff. It is a well settled principle that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of the title of the party in possession. BRINKLEY v. BRINKLEY. (Filed June 5,... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1901
...8. DUE PROCESS OP LAW. See Constitution; Game Laws, & EJECTMENT. EJECTMENT— RECOVERY— TITLE.— A plaintiff In ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of his adversary's. (Hammond v. Shepard, 274.) See Fraudulent Conveyance, &.... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1902 - 858 str.
...learned counsel for the petitioner contended that, as this was an action of ejectment, the plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of defendant's title. This is a correct proposition of law, which was observed on the trial of this case,... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1917 - 1114 str.
...testimony should not be rejected because of some supposed interest on their part. While as a general rule a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of that of his adversary, the rule holds where title is asserted against title and not to a case where... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1910 - 1192 str.
...a title derived through them as against another claimant who was not a party to the proceeding. The plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, not on the weakness or lack of title in the defendant. APPEAL by the defendant, The New York, New Haven... | |
 | Austin Wakeman Scott, Sidney Post Simpson - 1946 - 998 str.
...difference, for it is a settled doctrine, that the lessor of the plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of his adversary's. The judgment must be affirmed with cost.1 JACKSON ex dew. MURRAY v. HAZEN. SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE,... | |
 | 1884 - 876 str.
...time, and the object of the change, if a change was made. Prom time out of mind it was established that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title, and that it was not necessary to go into anything on the part of the defendant, who might put him at arm's... | |
| |
The rule that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's... 
