 | Christopher Columbus Andrews - 1857 - 232 str.
...the action, plaintiff and defendant ; 2d, a statement of the facts constituting the cause of action in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended ; 3d, a demand of the relief to which the plaintiff supposes... | |
 | William H. R. Wood - 1857 - 834 str.
...indictment. 6. That the act or omission charged as the offense, is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. 7. That the act or omission charged as the offense is... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1857 - 788 str.
...new matter constituting a defence, counter-claim or set-off, without unnecessary repetition. SEC. 12. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defence, counter-claim, or set-off, as he may have, whether they be such as have been heretofore denominated... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1859 - 654 str.
...while containing them, violated the third subdivision of § 56, 2 RS p. 39, which provides that, " The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, &c., as he shall have. Each shall be distinctly stated in a separate paragraph, and numbered,... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Erasmus Peshine Smith, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Joel Tiffany, Samuel Hand - 1860 - 650 str.
...subdivision '2, the complaint is to contain a statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. By § 128 the answer of the defendant shall contain,... | |
 | Colorado, Jefferson Territory - 1860 - 312 str.
...and concise language and without repetition. Grounds of defence to be set forth in answer. SEC. 209. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defence as he may have. Each must be separately stated and numbered, and they must contain a denial of each allegation,... | |
 | 1861 - 758 str.
...out on motion (§§ 136, 137.) These provisions, with the general one that allegations must be . " in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended, are absolutely the only important rules of pleading... | |
 | Thomas Berry Cusack Smith - 1863 - 140 str.
...ed by him, or any knowledge or information thereof sufficient to form a belief ; and he may allege, in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended, any new matter, not inconsistent with the complaint,... | |
 | Idaho - 1864 - 734 str.
...indictment. Sixth. That the act or omission charged as the offence is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. Seventh. That the act or omission charged as the offence... | |
 | Idaho (Ter.) - 1864 - 762 str.
...indictment. Sixth. That the act or omission charged as the oftbnce is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. Seventh. That the act or omission charged as the offence... | |
| |
... 6. That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended; 7. 
