 | Indiana, Harrison Burns - 1894 - 1050 str.
...new matter constituting a defense, counter-claim, or set-off, in plain and concise language. Third. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counter-claim, and set-off, whether legal or equitable, as he shall have. Each shall be distinctly... | |
 | Washington (State). Supreme Court, Eugene Genroy Kreider - 1895 - 798 str.
...provides that the information or indictment should be a statement of the acts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person with common understanding to know what is intended. When the information or indictment is direct and... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1909 - 958 str.
...regarded as a precedent in the light of holdings in our own state. Section 5067 Rev. Stat. provides that the defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counterclaim or setoff as he may have, so long as they are not inconsistent with each other.... | |
 | Charles McGuffey Hepburn - 1897 - 348 str.
...to be a complaint, which "shall contain a statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what was intended". The only pleading by the defendant was to be "either... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1898 - 864 str.
...follows: "The indictment must contain: * * * (2) A statement of the facts constituting the offense, in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended." The statute under which the indictment was found, is... | |
 | Indiana. Appellate Court - 1898 - 790 str.
...contain "a statement of facts constituting the cause of Speeder Cycle Company v. Teeter. action, in plain and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended." pp. 479, 480. From the Henry Circuit Court. Reversed.... | |
 | 1898 - 1222 str.
...that: "The complaint shall contain * • * a statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, In ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and In such a manner as to enable a i>erson of common understanding to know what is intended." Laws 1S49, p. 645, § 142, subd. 2. Section... | |
 | 1899 - 960 str.
...opinion 3 Circ. Dec., 613. 18 Hooven and Allison Co. v. National Cordage Co. Section 5071 provides that "the defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counter-claim and set-off, as he has." There is no limitation on this right except what is... | |
 | 1900 - 938 str.
...defenses are inconsistent. Vail v. Jones, 31 Ind. 467, announces the doctrine that under the Code, the defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense as he may have, without regard to the location of the subject-matter, which wai simply the... | |
 | Ohio - 1900 - 836 str.
...counteroffs.ms Several defenses must be separately stated and numbered. What a counterclaim. Sec. 5067. The defendant may set forth in his answer as many grounds of defense, counter-claim and set-off as he may have, whether they are such as have been heretofore denominated... | |
| |
... 6. That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended; 7. 
