 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 str.
...therefore that, as to those provisions, the act was invalid under section 21, art. 5, of the Constitution : "No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." This law is penal in character. One convicted for a violation of its provisions is liable to both fine... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1900 - 804 str.
...therefore in conflict with section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution of this State, which provides that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. " We think this contention sufficiently answered by what was said by this court in Soukup v. Van Dyke,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1890 - 784 str.
...that the statute is unconstitutional, nnder Article 4, § 20, of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. The section of Howell's Statutes, 9175, was added to our criminal laws by Act No. 116, Laws of 1867.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1888 - 776 str.
...etc." Conviction reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion. Spaulding & Barker, for respondent : "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title," Const. Art. 4, § 20, and this provision is mandatory : Cooley's Const. Lira. §§ 82, 150. The Legislature,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1922 - 818 str.
...TITLE. Nor does said act violate section 21, Art. 5, of the State Constitution, which requires that "no law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." 5. CRIMINAL LAW — SHARING IN PROCEEDS OF PROSTITUTION — TRIAL — APPEAL AND ERROR. Where it cannot... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1893 - 788 str.
...— It does not violate section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution of Michigan, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title, in that it provides for the election of alternate electors, whereas the title relates only to choosing... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1887 - 736 str.
...Robinson v. McAfee Ettate, 375. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 1. The purpose of the constitutional provision that " no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title " [sec. 20, Art. 4] was to prevent "the practice of bringing together mto one bill subjects diverse... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1910 - 804 str.
...intoxicating liquors is not in violation of the Constitution of 1850, art. 4, £ 20, providing that no law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title, in that it provides a civil remedy for the violation of the statute. 2 Comp. Laws, §§ 6379-6446.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1907 - 792 str.
...unconstitutional, in that it violates section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. It is established by our decisions that, if what is introduced by way of an amendment to an act might... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1868 - 610 str.
...subject of a single act. It does not conflict with that provision of the c nstltution which declares that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in Its title. Cotlt: Prevailing party. Under the Comp. L. $5537, subd. 4, the plaintiff was entitled to costs " in... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title... 
